Literal values loose type

Capella
1

Hi all
I just made another model validation run:
It reported about 6500 events that concern literal value which lost their type… I suspect all are concerned.

I can’t solve it by mass editing view, because no detail data appear there in selection window, despite I can do it through the individual edit window. Then the new value appears again in the mass view!

Another other pb already reported and not solved can may be linked to this: When an exchange item is deallocated from an interface, it looses its name!

A request about the validation tool: we use it before model completion: is it possible to limit the check and prevent to raise 7000 incident because physical architecture layer is not yet modeled…
Thanks for any information or advise

Edit1: continuing the list: it includes MaxCard, MinCard of type link, which are untyped now!
Edit2: More generic, I suspect data recording while model saving, too many links vanish… My model is as close as possible to the root of my C drive which is not complying to my business rules to avoid path length issues (Letter naming a network place does not solve it). My PC runs windows10.

2

Hi Thierry,

All these problems you are facing looks unusual…
To answer your questions:

  • in the preference, you can decide which validation rules you want to activate or not
  • you may use Python4Capella to to a bulk fix of your problems…

Stephane

3

Thanks Stephane
Despite these flags (no type) are warnings, they cannot cause anything else?
Example: EI lost its name is a warning, the sequence message in IS is a warning, but the naming conflict between the no names in the EI folder is an Error…
Regards Thierry

4

PS:
Could you tell the minimum processor/RAM set up to run Capella and may be the advised ratio RAM/Allocated memory through the ini file? or may be the project size related to all this
My model has now 96 capabilities, about 130 scenarios, in SA and LA each has the 4 diagrams, OA has been cut already and reduce to SA size, SF and 200 LF… System has 3 state machines,
I use about 1400 EI, 150 PV…

Thanks

5

These warning and errors should not cause a technical error as they are more at a business level in general. If you use the model to generate an ICD, having duplicate names may be considered as an error.
The error you should be careful with (in the technical sense for the integrity of your model) are in general the one in the EMF category (there is a good chance you don’t have some).

6

I cannot but let’s see if someone here at Obe can help…

7

Hi Stephane
Giving some additional information: I just deactivated the transition of OPV and APV include to item transition (mainly components. The same PV may come as applied to an item AND as owned by another item. May be we should never activate both transitions): due to some re transition of scenarios for correction, I have some multiple realisation links in functional ports, and some PV duplications. This has may be some links…
I continue model repairs… without python (Anaconda forbidden here, P4C does not run with another python, and I did not try the new P4C)
Regards
Thierry

Edit1: Some interaction use when having lost reference are not accessible anymore…
Edit2: For some reason, double click on an interaction use opens the referenced scenario… I’m always surprised, expecting opening the edit window. No chance to choose it?